Legal Opinion

Hemphill v. Lenz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1963No. Appeal, 288PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

M!r. Justice Cohen,

This is an appeal from the order of the court below compelling appellant Lenz to appear before the controller of the City of Philadelphia for the purpose of answering questions and producing records in compliance with a subpoena issued under §8-409 of the Philadelphia Home Rule Charter.1

*11Marbelite Company, Inc. (Marbelite), a New York corporation, entered into contracts with the City of Philadelphia for the delivery of traffic signal equipment. Appellee, controller of the City of Philadelphia, acting pursuant to §8-109 of the Philadelphia Home Rule Charter,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  2. Commonwealth v. Dauphin CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. OrsiniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Cudahy Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  5. Cathcart v. CrumlishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In the Matter of ShigonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Pennsylvania Crime Commission PetitionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Cooney v. Pennsylvania Osteopathic Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. In re Crime Commission's Subpoena Enforcement PetitionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. People ex rel. Orcutt v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API