Legal Opinion

Prudential Preferred Properties v. Underwood Ranch Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1994No. 93-139PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

Prudential Preferred Properties (Prudential) sued the Underwood Ranch Company (Underwood) for a commission they claimed for the sale of Underwood’s property. The trial court granted Underwood summary judgment holding they did not owe Prudential a commission under their listing agreement as a matter of law.

We affirm.

Prudential raises the following issues:

ISSUE I

Whether the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment, holding that the sale of appellees’ ranch during the term of the parties’ exclusive listing agreement did not entitle the appellant to a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Deepwater Investments, Limited v. Jackson Hole Ski Corporation and Paul M. McCollisterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. True Oil Co. v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Cliff & Co., Ltd. v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. MoncriefWyoming Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Collins v. FinnellWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Mathis v. WendlingWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Mountain View/Evergreen Improvement & Service District v. Casper Concrete Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API