Legal Opinion

State Board of Equalization v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1939No. 2116PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riner, Chief Justice.

This proceeding in error was brought by the State Board of Equalization of the State of Wyoming, hereinafter generally designated as the “Board,” or “plaintiff in error,” to review a judgment of the district court of Laramie County in favor of the Stanolind Oil and Gas Company, a Delaware Corporation, authorized to transact business in this State by virtue of its laws relative to foreign corporations, subsequently herein referred to as the “Company,” or the “defendant in error.” The questions presented and requiring disposition arise under the so-called “Selective Sales…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. The Pipe Line CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Burke v. MeadIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Beggs v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  4. Merchants Refrigerating Co. v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. People Ex Rel. Brush Electric Manufacturing Co. v. WempleNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Duhame v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State Board of Equalization v. Cheyenne Newspapers, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Ass'n v. State Board of Equalization, Department of Revenue & TaxationWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Moncrief v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Pacificorp, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API