Legal Opinion

Boyce v. Concord General Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 16, 1981No. 80-303PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

This is an interlocutory transfer without ruling on a petition for declaratory judgment to determine insurance coverage. The plaintiff, Arline R. Boyce, is the administratrix of the estate of her son, Robin L. Boyce. The defendants are two insurance companies, Merchants Insurance Group (Merchants) and Concord General Mutual Insurance Company (Concord General), and Darrel Macomber and Elwin E. Macomber, who are the defendants in the underlying negligence actions brought by the plaintiff.

For the purpose of this appeal, the parties have stipulated to the following facts. On July 7, 1976, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robbins Auto Parts, Inc. v. Granite State InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. Vigneault v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Peerless Insurance v. VigueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  4. Murphy v. BatemanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Town of Epping v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  2. State v. WongSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  3. Unit Owners Ass'n of Summit Vista Lot 8 Condominium v. MillerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  4. New Hampshire Automobile Dealers Ass'n v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1985
  5. Trefethen v. New Hampshire Insurance GroupSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API