Legal Opinion

Barthe v. Rogers

California Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1899No. S.F. No. 1793PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an- order denying a new trial. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The plaintiff presented a claim to the defendant against the estate of her intestate, which was rejected by her, and thereupon brought the present action to establish the same. Judgment was rendered in his favor, and the defendant has appealed.

The claim presented by the plaintiff was for services of divers kinds rendered the deceased at different times from October, 1893, to the date of her death, March 29, 1897, and expenses incurred therein, and was made up of fourteen separate items, to each of which a specific value was fixed, amounting in the aggregate to seven hundred and seventy-eight…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lichtenberg v. McGlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Branch v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Bechtel v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Nesbit v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Enscoe v. FletcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  5. Dakota National Bank v. KleinschmidtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API