Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
The employer in this case required its employees, warehouse workers who retrieved inventory and packaged it for shipment, to undergo an antitheft security screening before leaving the warehouse each day. The question presented is whether the employees' time spent waiting to undergo and undergoing those security screenings is compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., as amended by the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, § 251 et seq. We hold that the time is not compensable. We therefore reverse the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. BouaphakeoSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Daniel Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Jeffrey Moran v. Al Basit LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Millan v. Cascade Water Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2015
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.