Legal Opinion

Marriage of Fairburn v. Fairburn

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1985No. C1-85-365PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

This judgment in dissolution was entered prior to June 1, 1973. Appellants moved to increase child support. The trial court increased child support until the child attained age 18, then reduced support until age 21. Appellant’s motion to require respondent to list the child on his medical insurance was denied. Attorneys fees were also denied. Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part.

FACTS

The parties were married in 1965 and divorced in 1970. Their only child, Chad, was born in 1970. The parties stipulated to support of $100 per month, payable to age 21 and this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brugger v. BruggerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Hampton v. HamptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Lieder v. StraubSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Yaeger v. YaegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Eckholm v. EckholmCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marriage of Winter v. WinterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Marriage of Katz v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Marriage of Winter v. WinterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. McGleno v. McGlenoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API