Legal Opinion

Eckholm v. Eckholm

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1985No. C9-84-2127, C1-85-9PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

In this post-dissolution matter, the husband moved to terminate his obligation to pay maintenance and to reduce his support obligations. Wife countered by seeking arrearages of maintenance and child support, audit costs, expert witness fees, costs, and attorney fees. The trial court denied husband’s motion for modification, entered judgment in wife’s favor for half of the arrearages she sought, and ordered husband to pay audit fees and expert witness fees. The court denied wife’s motion for fees for transcripts of hearings and depositions and for attorney fees. Husband…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marriage of McClelland v. McClellandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Marriage of Bledsoe v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Abuzzahab v. AbuzzahabSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Gabbert v. GabbertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marriage of Sand v. SandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Marriage of Fairburn v. FairburnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Marriage of Huckbody v. FreeburgCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State, County of St. Louis Ex Rel. Anderson v. PhilipsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Wicks v. FalkowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API