Scovill v. Baldwin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Disseizin. Motion for a new trial by the defendant. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
This was an action of ejectment. The parties were adjoining proprietors, and the question was as to the location of the dividing line between them. The plaintiff’s evidence to prove the location as he claimed it, consisted in great part in showing that such had been for many years the practical line of the proprietors of the two lots, and had been recognized as the true line by the defendant’s father, who formerly owned the defendant’s lot; that the plaintiff had always occupied up to that line until the ouster complained of, and that the defendant had on many occasions, and always until…
2Cited by33 opinions
- Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Turner v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Carter v. ChambersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Bates v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- State v. MoranSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.