Legal Opinion

National Exchange Bank v. Hahn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 14, 1911No. 1078PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Clister County; James A. Tolbert,, Judge. Action by Huida Hahn against National Exchange Bank. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, to recover rent due according to the terms of a certain written' lease. On a trial before the court, there was judgment for the plaintiff for the full amount claimed, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.

There is no dispute concerning the lease or its terms, and the case turns entirely upon the proper amount of recovery, as a question of law. It seems that the defendant, a national bank, entered into voluntary liquidation under the national banking laws…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Higgins v. StreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Merrill v. WillisNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Higgins v. StreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J. E. Crosbie, Inc. v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Melton v. Cherokee Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API