Legal Opinion

Consolidated Petroleum Industries, Inc. v. Jacobs

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided February 24, 1983No. 11-82-068-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKENSON, Justice.

The principal issue on appeal is whether the Statute of Frauds 1 requires us to re verse a judgment for damages resulting from nonperformance of an oral contract for the sale of stock.

The jury answered all issues in favor of plaintiff, John R. Jacobs, 2 and judgment was rendered in his favor against defendants, Consolidated Petroleum Industries, Inc., D. Truitt Davis and Jack W. Young for the sum of $2,095,000.00 plus attorney fees. 3 Defendants appeal. We reverse and render.

The issues submitted to the jury, and the jury’s answers, are quoted in full:

SPECIAL ISSUE NO. 1

Do…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. " MOORE" BURGER, INC. v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Black Lake Pipe Line Co. v. Union Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Clements v. WithersTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Nagle v. NagleTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Maxey v. Citizens National Bank of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Southmark Corporation v. Life Investors, Inc., and Uslico CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  2. The Deauville Corporation v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Central Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Stemmons Northwest Bank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  4. Gannon v. Baker, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  5. Mann v. NCNB Texas National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API