Nagle v. Nagle

GREENHILL, Chief Justice.

In this action, Margie M. Nagle (Margie) sought damages because of a failure of her former husband, Frank T. Nagle (Frank), to convey his interest in a piece of real proper*798ty. Frank’s promise was oral. He relied upon the Statute of Frauds which says in substance:

A promise or agreement is not enforceable unless the promise or agreement is in writing and signed by the person to be charged. This applies to a contract for the sale of real estate.1

Notwithstanding the Statute of Frauds, the trial court rendered judgment for Margie. The judgment was based upon jury findings…