Legal Opinion

Alberts v. Husenetter

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1906No. 14,504PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Brown county: William H. Westover, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Eppekson, C.

This action was brought to recover damages for the negligent burning of. plaintiff’s cottonwood and mulberry trees. Plaintiff recovered judgment in the court below, and defendant appeals.

The most important question argued pertains to the admission of evidence as to damages sustained. Plaintiff as a witness in his own behalf was asked: “Now what effect does it (the grove) have upon the value of the land for the purposes for which you were using or preparing it, as a ranch?” Another witness was asked: “Now, can you fix the value of those trees in the grove there, standing there as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fremont, E. & M. V. R. v. CrumNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Kansas City & Omaha Railroad v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. TiptonNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Koyen v. Citizens National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Carter v. ParsonsNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Wortman v. ZimmermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Hart v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Spicer Ranch v. SchilkeNebraska Court of Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API