Legal Opinion

Lee Development Co. v. Papp

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 29, 1990No. 2 CA-CV 90-0121PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

This action arose out of a commercial lease for premises in a development in Phoenix known as Park Place. Appellees (Lee Development) filed a complaint for breach of lease. Appellants (Papp) answered and counterclaimed alleging the breach of a superceding written agreement and sought declaratory relief. The case was tried to the court, sitting without a jury, which, after making findings of fact and conclusions of law, entered judgment in favor of Lee Development on its complaint in the sum of $51,904.21 and in favor of Lee Development on Papp’s counterclaim.

The trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fleming v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Coronado Co. v. Jacome's Department Store, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  3. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. HarveyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Park Central Development Co. v. Roberts Dry Goods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Riggs v. MurdockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Great Lakes Aircraft Co. v. City of ClaremontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  2. Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. Enterprise Leasing Co. of Phoenix v. EhmkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. Brink Electric Construction Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API