Hauser v. State Ex Rel. Erdman
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
The agreed statement of facts discloses that the relator filed his application for a permit with the commissioner of buildings on January 31, 1924, and that this officer made no examination whether or not the plans attached thereto conformed to the state and city building codes; that if they did not so conform the relator was then, and has since been, willing to conform to all the laws and ordinances before commencing the erection of the building. The entire record also discloses that the specific reason why the plans were not accepted and the permit issued was that a zoning ordinance was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Bolce v. HauserOhio Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by16 opinions
- Trans-Oceanic Oil Corp. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Russian Hill Improvement Ass'n v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Munns v. StenmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Babbitt v. SayOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Roosevelt Hotel Bldg. Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.