State Ex Rel. Bolce v. Hauser
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
For the purposes of this case the demurrer concedes the truth of the allegations contained in the petition. It is therein alleged that the relators by filing their original plans and .specifications on March 13, 1924, and by preparation of their corrected plans and specifications, had complied with the building code of Cincinnati in force prior to May 4, 1924. It is manifest, therefore, that the relators were entitled to a building permit from the respondent, unless the latter was prevented from issuing the same by reason of the adoption by the city council of the two subsequent ordinances…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Hauser v. State Ex Rel. ErdmanOhio Supreme Court · 1925