Litwinko v. Gray
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge:
The instant appeal is from an order of the court below granting a directed verdict and point for binding instructions on behalf of appellee, the City of Philadelphia, and denying the motion of appellant Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) for a new trial. For the reasons stated herein, we reverse the order of the court below.
The facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows. On October 8, 1969, at or about 6:40 a. m., plaintiff was a passenger on a “Route 36” streetcar operated by defendant, Sommers, an employee of SEPTA. The streetcar was traveling along…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Otto E. Pritchard v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Noon v. KNAVELSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Cox v. Equitable Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Lescznski v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Evans v. Goldfine Truck Rental Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colloi v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Lattanze v. SilverstriniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- East Texas Motor Freight, Diamond Division v. LloydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- World of Tires, Inc. v. American InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Colloi v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.