Legal Opinion

East Texas Motor Freight, Diamond Division v. Lloyd

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1984No. 252PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

Appellant, David H. Lloyd, an independent trucker, entered into an agreement with appellee, East Texas Motor Freight (East Texas). Lloyd, using his own tractor-trailer combination, agreed to haul a load of insulation owned by Monsanto Corporation from California to Ohio. The trip lease agreement between the parties provided in pertinent part:

In the event of any loss or damage or destruction to cargo or property damage or bodily injury to any third person, the Lessor does hereby agree to assume and be fully responsible for any such damage and in the event payment shall be made…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Tose v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Nicolella v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Westinghouse Electric Co. v. Murphy, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Spang & Co. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Somerset Community Hospital v. Allan B. Mitchell & Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Boyle v. SteimanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Bloom v. DuBois Regional Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Trombetta v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API