State v. Pena Garcia
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Jose Pena Garcia appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of actual physical control. Pena Garcia argues he was denied due process because the State engaged in pros-ecutorial misconduct when the prosecutor read case law to the jury during closing arguments. We affirm the judgment.
I
[¶ 2] In September 2010, Pena Garcia was arrested and charged with actual physical control in violation of N.D.C.C. § 39-08-01, a class B misdemeanor.
[¶ 3] A jury trial was held on March 1, 2011. The State presented evidence from Brandon Rakoczy and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. KruckenbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. HaverlukNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Grand Forks v. CameronNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Rist v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. PattersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. EvansNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. DeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. KalmioNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. FosterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.