Legal Opinion

State v. Pena Garcia

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 2012No. 20110090PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Jose Pena Garcia appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of actual physical control. Pena Garcia argues he was denied due process because the State engaged in pros-ecutorial misconduct when the prosecutor read case law to the jury during closing arguments. We affirm the judgment.

I

[¶ 2] In September 2010, Pena Garcia was arrested and charged with actual physical control in violation of N.D.C.C. § 39-08-01, a class B misdemeanor.

[¶ 3] A jury trial was held on March 1, 2011. The State presented evidence from Brandon Rakoczy and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. KruckenbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. HaverlukNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. City of Grand Forks v. CameronNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Rist v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. PattersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. EvansNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. DeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. KalmioNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. FosterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API