Legal Opinion

Maschmeijer v. Ingram

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 22, 1951PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGOHEY, District Judge.

The Court has before it a series of motions in two actions between essentially the same parties. The motions involved in the second action will be considered first. They are plaintiff’s motions directed to the answer and defendants’ motion to compel a reply to affirmative defenses.

The Motions Directed to the Answer.

The complaint here asserts six claims or causes of action in an action which plaintiff’s memorandum characterizes as one “for unfair competition and breach of the terms of trust and contract upon which defendant A. Maschmeijer, Jr., Inc. held the trade…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. United States v. StinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Fowle v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Feldman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. United States v. Timken Roller Bearing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Randolph v. Franklin Inv. Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Wohl v. Blair & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  3. Poka v. HoliHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  4. In Re CutilloUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1995
  5. Fowler v. MumfordSuperior Court of Delaware · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API