Folkens Ex Rel. Estate of McLendon v. Hunt
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Toal, Justice:
The dispositive issue in this case is whether the trial judge abused his discretion by invoking the thirteenth juror doctrine and granting the defendants’ motion for a new trial absolute. We conclude that there was no abuse and, therefore, affirm.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
M. Murray McLendon, Jr. originally brought this action against the partners of J. W. Hunt & Co. (Hunt), an accounting firm, alleging causes of action for accounting malpractice, fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress and a violation of the S. C. Unfair Trade Practices Act. The circuit court granted…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. ClarksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Folkens v. HuntCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. TownsendSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- SC DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS & PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION v. MooneyhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Southeastern Mobile Homes, Inc. v. WalickiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
3Cited by35 opinions
- Vinson v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- RFT Management Co. v. Tinsley & Adams L.L.P.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Tommy L. Griffin Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Jordan, Jones & Goulding, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Griffin Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Jordan, Jones & Goulding, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Smith v. HaynsworthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.