Legal Opinion

Folkens Ex Rel. Estate of McLendon v. Hunt

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 8, 1990No. 23129PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

The dispositive issue in this case is whether the trial judge abused his discretion by invoking the thirteenth juror doctrine and granting the defendants’ motion for a new trial absolute. We conclude that there was no abuse and, therefore, affirm.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

M. Murray McLendon, Jr. originally brought this action against the partners of J. W. Hunt & Co. (Hunt), an accounting firm, alleging causes of action for accounting malpractice, fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress and a violation of the S. C. Unfair Trade Practices Act. The circuit court granted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. South Carolina State Highway Department v. ClarksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Folkens v. HuntCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. South Carolina State Highway Department v. TownsendSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. SC DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS & PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION v. MooneyhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. Southeastern Mobile Homes, Inc. v. WalickiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Vinson v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. RFT Management Co. v. Tinsley & Adams L.L.P.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  3. Tommy L. Griffin Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Jordan, Jones & Goulding, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Griffin Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Jordan, Jones & Goulding, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Smith v. HaynsworthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API