Legal Opinion
Commercial Discount Corp. v. King
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 14, 1981No. 78 C 3442PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Commercial Discount Corporation (“CDC”) and Leaseamatic, Inc. (“Leaseamatic,” a CDC subsidiary) sued defendants William S. King (“King”) and Horace Rainey, Jr. (“Rainey”) on their joint and several personal guaranties of certain indebtedness of Racran Corp. (“Racran”). CDC and Leaseamatic moved for partial summary judgment against King on the issue of liability. This Court’s September 23, 1980 memorandum opinion and order (the “Opinion”) granted that motion. King has now moved to vacate the summary judgment on the basis of supplemental…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- O'Hare International Bank, a National Banking Association v. Berlon E. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Commercial Discount Corp. v. BayerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- National Can Corp. v. Whittaker Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- McEntire v. Indiana National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Shawmut Worcester County Bank, N.A. v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- First Nat'l Bk of Chicago v. BoelcskevyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Instituto Nacional De Comercializacion Agricola (INDECA) v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Prescott v. Thompson Tractor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.