Legal Opinion

First Valley Bank of Los Fresnos v. Martin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 2004No. 01-0910PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brister

in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice HECHT, Justice ■ OWEN, Justice O’NEILL, Justice JEFFERSON, Justice SMITH, and Justice WAINWRIGHT joined.

A debtor violates the Texas Penal Code if he removes, conceals, or sells secured property with intent to appropriate it.1 In this case, a jury found that Sam Martin owed $50,000 to First Valley Bank of Los Fresnos, and he admits he sold a substantial part of the collateral and kept the money for himself.

Yet Martin claims the Bank maliciously prosecuted him by complaining to the authorities, who indicted him but later dismissed the charges. A Cameron…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Jernigan v. LangleyTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Richey v. Brookshire Grocery Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Barker v. Coastal Builders, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Perry Homes v. CullTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Texas Disposal Systems Landfill, Inc. v. Waste Management Holdings, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  3. Gaines v. KellyTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Marin Real Estate Partners, L.P. v. VogtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  5. Van Independent School District v. McCartyTexas Supreme Court · 2005

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API