Legal Opinion
Fludd v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 22, 1975No. 6644PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Associate Judge:
Appellant was convicted by a jury of Burglary II (D.C. Code 1973, § 22-1801(b)) and petit larceny (D.C. Code 1973, § 22-2202). On appeal, through an amicus, he challenges the validity of the several identifications made of him by the complainant; the court’s use of the word “defendant” rather than “person” in one portion of an identification instruction, and the court’s refusal to sentence him under the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act, 18 U.S.C. § 4251 et seq. The same claims of error, and more, are urged by appellant in a pro se brief on appeal. Since one point…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Spencer Womack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Norman Salley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- United States v. William Dove WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- Foster v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Stack v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Singletary v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Walden v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Towles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Mulky v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.