Legal Opinion

Perfect Investments, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 14, 1989No. 71996PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KAUGER, Justice.

The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the appellant/loss payee/mortgagee may proceed with an action against the appellee/insurance company after the insured dismisses her claim with prejudice following settlement with the insurance company. We find that the cause is governed by Conner v. Northwestern Nat'l Casualty Co., 774 P.2d 1055, 1057 (Okla.1989), in which we held that a loss payee may maintain an action against an insurer if a settlement is reached between the insurer and its insured without the loss payee’s knowledge and consent. We find that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conner v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Expert South Tulsa, LLC v. Cornerstone Creek Partners, LLC (In re Expert South Tulsa, LLC)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  2. Winterhalder v. Burggraf Restoration, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. Bank of Nichols Hills v. Bank of OklahomaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
  4. E.H. Hawes Revocable Trust v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas - Kansas CityBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  5. Sisk v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API