Legal Opinion
Bank of Nichols Hills v. Bank of Oklahoma
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 17, 2008No. 104095. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 4Published
1Opinion of the Court
DOUG GABBARD II, Presiding Judge.
T 1 Plaintiff, Bank of Nichols Hills (BNH), appeals a trial court judgment for Defendant, Bank of Oklahoma (BOK), regarding payment of a forged check. The primary issue on appeal is whether BOK presented sufficient proof to support the trial court's finding that the 12A 00.98.2001 § 8-406 preclusion defense applied. We find that it did, and affirm.
FACTS
T2 The parties stipulated to most of the following facts: Michael and Stacy Russell owned a mobile home in Harrah, Oklahoma. The home was insured by Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (Farm Bureau).…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Von Gohren v. Pacific National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- First National Bank of Kerrville v. Estate of Hackworth, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
- East Gadsden Bank v. First City Nat. Bank of GadsdenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Thompson Maple Products, Inc. v. Citizens National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- W. R. Grimshaw Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.