Legal Opinion

Matter of Eric

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1986PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The appeals in these three cases should be dismissed upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is involved.

In each of these juvenile delinquency proceedings, the appellant, a juvenile under 16 years of age, was charged with having committed an act which, if done by an adult, would have constituted a crime (see, Family Ct Act art 3). In each case, Family Court held a brief Wade or Huntley hearing, well under an hour in length, followed immediately by a fact-finding hearing lasting no longer than two hours. In two of the cases, one witness…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. People v. BallottNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. People v. SandersNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. People v. ZabrockyNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. People ex rel. Cadogan v. McMannNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. In re Alizia McK.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. People v. WrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API