People v. Wray
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the *719court erred by conducting the Wade hearing after opening statements were made, since the defendant "impliedly consented to the irregular procedure” (People v Melendez, 141…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Matter of EricNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. MelendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Raymond Wray v. City of New York, Daniel Martorano, William Weller, James McCavera and New York City Police Department, Docket No. 05-3341-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Raymond Wray v. Sally B. Johnson, Superintendent, Orleans Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- WARY v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- People v. DawsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. Murphy (Joseph)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.