Legal Opinion
People v. Green
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 14, 1989PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s request for the transcript of the Wade hearing was not made prior to the conclusion of the hearing (People v Sanders, 31 NY2d 463, 467) and, therefore, was untimely (see, Matter of Eric W., 68 NY2d 633). Moreover, defendant suffered no prejudice from the court’s denial of his request for an adjournment of the victim’s trial testimony until the Wade hearing could be transcribed. Only about IV2 hours separated the conclusion of the hearing and the commencement of the victim’s testimony, and defense attorney was able to impeach the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. BornholdtNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- People v. SandersNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Matter of EricNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. CrespoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. HernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. CopelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re Carlton M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.