Legal Opinion

Smith v. Fischer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1931No. File No. 6739PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoleey, P. J.

This action is brought by the superintendent of banks on behalf of the Cottonwood State Bank, which is in the hands of the superintendent of banks for liquidation. The action is based on the provisions of sections 8980 and 8990 of the Revised Code of 1919. Section 8980 reads as follows: “No individual, firm or corporation ‘transacting a banking business in this state shall loan to any corporation, partnership or individual, including all loans made to the several members of such corporation or partnership, more than twenty per cent of the paid up capital and surplus of such bank. And in no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Jones v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. State v. YegenMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Ranchman's State Bank v. LenningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Farmers State Bank v. YoungersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Noble v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Matter of HeuermannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Smith v. LyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Knudtson v. Citizens' National Bank & Trust Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Smith v. LyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API