Legal Opinion

Popp v. Cash Station, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 4, 1992No. 1-90-0321PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gordon

In this consumer class action, plaintiff seeks to enjoin the operation of defendants’ automated teller machine (ATM) network due to defendants’ failure to provide even minimum reasonable personal security systems for the protection of its cardholders from third-party criminal attacks, or alternatively, to require defendants to provide such security systems. Plaintiff appeals from the dismissal, pursuant to section 2 — 615 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 110, par. 2—615), of her first amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action. We affirm the trial court’s decision.

Defendant Cash…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  5. Rowe v. State Bank of LombardIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Smith v. Prime Cable of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. Lawson v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. Reid v. Unilever United States, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  4. Industrial Specialty Chemicals, Inc. v. Cummins Engine Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  5. Sherman v. RyanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API