Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Frisch
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.
The first question presented by this appeal involves the sufficiency of the appellee’s complaint. The issue "was raised by a demurrer for want of facts which the appellant contends was erroneously overruled. The complaint alleges in substance that the appellee’s life is insured in the sum of $10,000.00 through a certain policy issued by the appellant and that by a supplementary contract, attached thereto- and made a part thereof, the appellant agreed:
“that upon receipt by the Company at its Home Office in the City of New York of due proof, on forms which will be furnished by the Company, on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Union Fraternal League v. SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- Hablutzel v. Home Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. FinkelsteinIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Todd v. MurdockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Wallace v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. ShortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Walter S. Jordan v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Grotefend v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953