Legal Opinion
Grotefend v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 29, 1953Published
1Opinion of the Court
26 N.J. Super. 61 (1953)
97 A.2d 427
EMIL H. GROTEFEND, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AN INSURANCE CORPORATION OF MASSACHUSETTS. AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 4, 1953.
Decided May 29, 1953.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and JAYNE.
Mr. Charles M. James argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Smith, James & Mathias, attorneys).
Mr. John P. Nugent argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. Nugent & Rollenhagen, attorneys).
The opinion of the court…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. MiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co., Philadelphia v. TaubelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Ginell v. . the Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Whittle v. Associated Indemnity Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
- Ginell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.