Legal Opinion

Pacific Electric Railway Co. v. Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1921No. Civ. No. 4048PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, Arthur Keetch, Deputy Attorney-General, and John W. Maltman for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff by complaint in interpleader to determine ownership of certain moneys owing by the plaintiff by reason of a judgment against it. The state of California intervened and the trial court found in favor of the defendants George L. Makley, Los Angeles Stone Company, and E. J. Lennox, and against the intervener. This appeal is taken .by the intervener. The facts are:

On or about the twenty-ninth day of August, 1914, George L. Makley was injured through the negligence of the Pacific Electric Railway Company, a corporation. At that time the Commonwealth Bonding…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Assignment of the Mutual Guaranty Fire Insurance v. BarkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. Visalia Gas & Electric Light Co. v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ogdon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Rosenberg v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. A. C. Frost & Co. v. Coeur D'Alene Mines Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Prudential Insurance of America v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Williams v. Caruso Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API