Legal Opinion
Karkoukli's, Inc. v. C. Hugh Dohany, Oakland County Treasurer, and Waterford Township
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 17, 2005No. 04-1237PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MERRITT, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Karkoukli’s, Inc. (“Karkoukli’s”) appeals the District Court’s summary judgment in favor of defendants in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case involving Oakland County, Michigan’s foreclosure sale of real property due to Karkoukli’s delinquency in paying property taxes. The only issue on appeal is whether defendants’ efforts to serve notice on plaintiff, regarding the foreclosure, tax sale and period for redemption, were constitutionally adequate. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
SUMMARY OF FACTS
Karkoukli’s, Inc., a Michigan corporation formed in 1996,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Elizabeth L. Ferguson v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Cleveland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Smith v. Cliffs on the Bay Condominium Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
3Cited by30 opinions
- Pfahler v. National Latex Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Gooch v. Life Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Fidel v. FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- The Keene Group, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Ming Yang v. City of Wyoming, Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.