Legal Opinion

Southern Blasting Services, Inc. v. Wilkes County

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 29, 2002No. 01-2098PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and Judge GREGORY joined.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Southern Blasting Services, Inc. and Piedmont Drilling & Blasting, Inc. seek to conduct explosives businesses and blasting operations in Wilkes County, North Carolina using Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (“HMTA”) Class 1 materials. Plaintiffs challenge two County ordinances, one which requires permitting of explosives operations and one which regulates the storage and use of explosives in the County. Plaintiffs claim that the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Curtis v. Cintas Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Horne v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2008
  3. Zimmerman v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. RothCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Cline v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API