Legal Opinion

Save Mount Diablo v. Contra Costa County

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 2015No. A142357PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUMES, P. J.

Real parties in interest Ronald E. and Shirley Nunn bought a large tract of agricultural property in Contra Costa County. The tract was recorded as a single parcel, but it actually consisted of four separated parts of unequal size. These parts were formed years before the Nunns bought the property when a local agency acquired through eminent domain two narrow strips of land crossing the property and intersecting each other. A road was built on one strip, and a pipeline was buried under the other.

After the Nunns abandoned an effort to subdivide the property under the parcel…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ennabe v. ManosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Citizens for Covenant Compliance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Clemons v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Gardner v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Way v. City of Redwood City, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Cox v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Save Laurel Way v. City of Redwood CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Save Laurel Way v. City of Redwood CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Smith v. City of Santa Barbara CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API