Tuttle v. New Hampshire Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Ass'n
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Dissent
DALIANIS and Duggan, JJ.,
dissenting. The court today overturns a legislative decision to allocate $110 million to programs that promote access *659to needed health care for underserved persons and, instead, creates a potential $110 million windfall for the doctors, hospitals and other health care providers insured by the New Hampshire Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Association (JUA). Although one of the stated purposes of the JUA is to “promote the public interest in ensuring that consumers of health care services have adequate access to needed care,” N.H. ADMIN. RULES, Ins 1701.01, and…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.