Legal Opinion

In Re the Care & Treatment of Donaldson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 13, 2007No. SC 87569PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM. 1

Introduction

The attorney general filed a petition to determine that Timothy S. Donaldson was a sexually violent predator. The matter was scheduled for trial. 2 An insufficient number of jurors remained after the potential jurors were questioned, and the court sustained Donaldson’s motion for a mistrial. 3 The court did not try the case within 90 days after the mistrial. Donaldson filed a motion thereafter to dismiss, alleging that section 632.495 4 required retrial within 90 days. The court overruled the motion, finding the administration of justice required the continuance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Doe v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  3. Bachtel v. Miller County Nursing Home DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. Care & Treatment of Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  5. Care & Treatment of Murrell v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Rafael Lozano v. BNSF Railway CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. Care & Treatment of Murrell v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  3. Care & Treatment of Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  4. St. Louis County v. River Bend Estates Homeowners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  5. Deborah Barkley v. McKeever Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Price ChopperSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API