Legal Opinion

City of Emeryville v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1991No. A055362PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MERRILL, Acting P. J.

We address the question of whether a court has jurisdiction to grant summary judgment or summary adjudication when the defendant presents a valid defense. Between 1939 and 1991 the answer was clear and affirmative. In 1990, the Legislature amended the summary judgment statute to solve different problems and in the process cast doubt upon well-established law. We grant a writ of mandate to restate the defendant’s right to establish a defense.

The City of Emeryville (Emeryville) is a cross-defendant in an action brought by a motorist injured in a collision between her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Chern v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Sanchez v. South Hoover HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Joslin v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Miller v. Bechtel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brantley v. PisaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Westlye v. Look Sports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Toigo v. Town of RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Capogeannis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Lilienthal & Fowler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API