Legal Opinion
United States v. Bruce Everett Harrod
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 16, 1999No. 97-1660PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Bruce Everett Harrod and codefendants photocopied five-dollar bills and fed the photocopies into change machines in a quest to collect quarters. A jury convicted Harrod of violating the anti-counterfeiting statute, 18 U.S.C. § 474 (“ § 474”). Paragraph five of § 474(a) criminalizes possession of obligations made “in whole or in part[ ] after the similitude” of United States’ obligations with the intent to use the same.
Harrod argues that the district court improperly denied his Fed. R. Crim. P. 29 motion for a judgment of acquittal. He contends that one-sided…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lustig v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ruth Kitchen v. Chippewa Valley Schools Chippewa Valley School Board of Education George Depillo Thomas Scullen and Edward SkowneskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Charles W. And Margaret Laverne Beard v. Norwegian Caribbean LinesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. ForbesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- United States v. John R. Prince (98-6361), Tony White (98-6362)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Chucks EmuegbunamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. KuehneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. J. Richard JamiesonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Jose Ruiz Solorio (01-5602) Ricky Martin Luna (01-5603) Delmas Dennis (01-5666) Marco Juarez (01-5667)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.