Legal Opinion
Margot Von Opel v. Uebersee Finanz Korporation, A. G. Liestal, Switzerland
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 23, 1955No. 12109PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAHY, Circuit Judge.
The appeal is from an order of the District Court denying a motion for leave to intervene as party plaintiff filed by Margot von Opel, as receiver and sequestrator of the property of Fritz von Opel. The suit in which she seeks to intervene had been brought by her husband, Fritz von Opel, against the Attorney General, successor to the Alien Property Custodian, under Section 9(a) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, 1 for recovery of property vested by the Custodian in 1942. Fritz von Opel’s suit had been authorized by the Supreme Court in 1952 in Uebersee Finanz-Korporation,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kaufman v. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Uebersee Finanz-Korporation, A. G. v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hans Tiedemann v. Herbert P. Brownell, Attorney General and Successor to the Alien Property CustodianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Berger v. RuoffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Uebersee Finanz-Korporation v. BrownellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- International Mortgage & Investment Corp. v. Von ClemmCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Margot Von Opel v. Fritz Von OpelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- International Mortgage & Investment Corporation v. Von ClemmCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Societe Internationale v. KennedyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964