Legal Opinion

Uebersee Finanz-Korporation v. Brownell

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 18, 1953No. Civ. No. 26453PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWS, Chief Judge.

Pursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in Uebersee Finanz-Korporation, A. G. v. McGrath, 1952, 343 U.S. 205, 72 S.Ct. 618, 96 L.Ed. 888, Fritz von Opel brought suit under Section 9(a) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, 40 Stat. 411, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 9(a), to recover property vested by the Alien Property Custodian in 1942. His wife, Margot von Opel, now seeks to intervene of right under Rule 24(a) (2) and (a) (3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. Her claim is made first, as a statutory receiver under New York…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Broderick v. RosnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Cummings v. Deutsche Bank Und DiscontogesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. International Mortgage & Investment Corp. v. Von ClemmCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Margot Von Opel v. Uebersee Finanz Korporation, A. G. Liestal, SwitzerlandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  3. International Mortgage & Investment Corporation v. Von ClemmCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API