Legal Opinion

Sohl v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 13, 1918PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Scott District Court. — A. J. House, Judge. Action for damages resulted in a directed verdict for defendant and judgment thereon. The plaintiff appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

1‘ «mSíbutory nOgligGIlCG I. A line of the defendant’s railway extends from Davenport in a southwesterly direction through Rockingham and Nahant. Between these latter places is what is known as the Nahant crossing, where the highway, running north -and south, passes over the railway. The angle is 315 degrees. Besides the westbound, or north, track, and the east-bound-track below it, there is a side track to the south. The railway is about 5 feet above the surface, the highway for a distance of 70 feet north of it having a 7% grade.

Shortly after 10 o’clock in the morning of March 30, 1915,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bruggeman v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Gray v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Hartman v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Dalton v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Adams v. Union Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hittle v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  2. Boles v. Hotel Maytag Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  3. Lindloff v. DueckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Monforton v. Northern Pacific Railway CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Richards v. BegenstosSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API