Hill v. Cherry
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from the denial of a Rule 59 (a), ARCP, motion for new trial of defendants, Cora Hill, Bessie Hill and Mary Julia Hill, in an action for equitable partition of real property among joint owners in which there was a settlement agreement incorporated into the final judgment. We affirm.
Issue
Did the trial court abuse its discretion by denying defendants' Rule 59 (a) motion for new trial?
Facts
Plaintiffs, Laura Lee Cherry and Jennie Hill, filed a bill for partition of real property. Defendants Cora Hill, Bessie Hill and Mary Julia Hill, filed an answer denying the necessity or the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maddox v. Druid City Hospital Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Cumberland Capital Corporation, Inc. v. RobinetteCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Hawk v. BiggioSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Robertson Banking Co. v. EbersoleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
3Cited by62 opinions
- Nat. SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Acceptance Ins. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- GREEN TREE ACCEPTANCE v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Black Belt Wood Co., Inc. v. SessionsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- American Nat. Fire Ins. Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.