Legal Opinion

Heyer Products Company v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 7, 1959No. 96-55PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge.

Plaintiff’s petition alleges that the defendant, through the Ordnance Tank Automotive Center, Ordnance Corps, Department of the Army, issued an invitation to it and to others to bid on 5,500 low voltage circuit testers; that it put in a bid of $205,975, which it says was the low bid, but that the contract was awarded to the Weidenhoff Company, whose bid was $190,043 higher. Under these facts, it alleges that it had a legal right to an award of the contract, and, hence, it is entitled to recover the expense it incurred in putting in its bid and its loss of profit.

Before going…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heyer Products Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  2. Caci, Inc.-Federal v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Keco Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  4. Parcel 49c Limited Partnership v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  5. Hayes International Corporation v. Dr. John L. McLucas Secretary of the Air Force, the Boeing Company, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API