Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh Terminal Corp. v. Mid Allegheny Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 23, 1987No. 86-1194PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIDENER, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiff in this action, Pittsburgh Terminal Corporation, appeals from the order of the district court dismissing its claim for lack of in personam jurisdiction over the defendants. We vacate and remand.1
The dispute in this case arose from the approval by defendant Mid Allegheny Corporation of a transaction through which Mid Allegheny exchanged its majority interest in Western Maryland Corporation for shares of CSX Corporation, Mid Allegheny’s parent corporation, as part of a merger between Western Maryland and CSX Minerals,, Inc., another CSX subsidiary.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Harrods Limited v. Sixty Internet Domain NamesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- In Re the Celotex Corporation, Debtor. Owens-Illinois, Incorporated v. Rapid American Corporation, Successor in Interest to Philip-Carey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- North Penn Gas Company v. Corning Natural Gas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Harte-Hanks Direct Marketing/Baltimore, Inc. v. Varilease Technology Finance Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- FAMILY FEDERATION FOR WORLD PEACE AND UNIFICATION INTERNATIONAL v. HYUN JIN MOONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.