Legal Opinion
North Penn Gas Company v. Corning Natural Gas Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 3, 1990No. 89-5343PublishedCited by 141 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
North Penn Gas Company appealed from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, dismissing North Penn’s complaint against Corning Natural Gas Corporation pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) for lack of in personam jurisdiction. The overarching issue presented on appeal was whether the district court properly determined that Corning lacked sufficient minimum contacts with Pennsylvania to grant a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). In an unpublished opinion, a panel of our court, with one dissent, determined…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by141 opinions
- Mellon Bank (East) Psfs, National Association v. Kenneth v. Farino Leslie Trinin Robert Levitas Eileen MichaelsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Diamond Crystal Brands, Inc. v. Food Movers International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Vetrotex Certainteed Corporation v. Consolidated Fiber Glass Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Tobias Chavez v. Dole Food Company IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Barna v. City of Perth AmboyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.