Legal Opinion
Pease & Curren Refining, Inc. v. Spectrolab, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 13, 1990No. CV 89-4468 DT (BX)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
TEVRIZIAN, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
This case arises from an accident which occurred at the refining plant of Plaintiff Pease & Curren Refining, Inc. (“Pease & Curren”) on March 21, 1989. Pease & Cur-ren extracts and refines precious metals from liquid and solid by-products (hereinafter “waste”) it receives from various clients. Defendant Spectrolab, Inc. (“Spec-trolab”) is one such client.
Currently before this court are three motions brought by Spectrolab pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 12(f) to dismiss and strike portions of Pease & Curren’s complaint. For the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- General Electric Company v. Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc. And Litton Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Bureerong v. UvawasDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1996
- Stanton Road Associates v. Lohrey Enterprises, Electronic Valet Systems, Inc., David Lohrey, Nathan PangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Neveu v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2005
- United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.