Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Hankins

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 1982No. Crim. 13641PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOON, J. *

Facts

After pleading guilty to possession of amphetamines (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378) pursuant to a stipulation that his sentence would run concurrent with any sentence imposed on another felony case, Richard Milton Hankins was referred for a narcotics evaluation under Welfare and Institutions Code section 3051. After spending 175 days at the California Rehabilitation Center (CRC), he was found unamenable to treatment. Criminal proceedings were reinstated and Hankins was sentenced to the upper term of three years. As against this term, the trial court gave Hankins credit…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. Ricky H.California Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. SaffellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. CarusoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. In Re HuffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re MabieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. In Re BenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API